The climate war is lost

Posted by admin in DC Life on 08 12th, 2007 | no responses

The climate war is lost and the proposed pan-civilizational ’surge’ against anthropogenic global warming will fail. We should pull out all of our (scientific) troops now.

Why is the Climate War doomed to fail, you ask? Answer: It’s a war based on lies. And poorly planned to boot.

I can’t help but think that that sounds awefully familiar.

The war in Iraq “is lost” and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday. “I believe … that that war is lost, and that surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq that week,” Reid told journalists. ~breitbart.com

Sadly, Democrats have no shame and no moral aversion to defeating America. Which is coincidentally why the Climate Surge will fail as well.

But how can I say that we’ve already lost the climate war and should just surrender? Well, as Harry Reid puts it, we will just fail in the end so why bother? Continuing to fight the climate war will just increase the casualties.

But Reid drew a parallel with former US president Lyndon Johnson who decided to deploy increasingly troops in Vietnam some 40 years ago when 24,000 US troops had already been killed.

“Johnson did not want a war loss on his watch, so he surged in Vietnam. After the surge was by, we added 34,000 to the 24,000 who died in Vietnam,” Reid said. ~breitbart.com

The climate war: a war based on lies

Bad intelligence, flawed assumptions, cherry-picking climate details, and an enviro-religious-ideological bent has led to the perfect storm of lies, damn lies and statistics.

As I have previously pointed out, the Global Warming War-Mongers refuse to acknowledge any evidence that contradicts their rush to war. preceding scientific facts have conveniently been ‘revised’ into non-existence. It is now heresy to even mention the Medieval Warming Period. Heresy is heresy after all.

The unprecedented historical record:

Propaganda is a wonderful thing. Even when it’s in the service of the global warming religion. But what happens when the propaganda gimmick is exposed? Do the ‘consensus’ scientists apologize or do they disregard it?

Last year [2006] was the warmest in the continental United States in the past 112 years — capping a nine-year warming streak “unprecedented in the historical record” that was driven in part by the burning of fossil fuels, the government reported yesterday.

…”People should be concerned approximately what we are doing to the climate,” said Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring department of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration. “Burning of fossil fuels is causing an increase in greenhouse gases, and there’s a broad scientific consensus that is producing climate change.” ~washingtonpost.com

When the ‘hottest year on record’ is trumpeted from the housetops as being 2006, and that ‘fact’ is held out as proof, they say, that global warming is real and happening now, but next when the data is found to be faulty and 1934 apparently is the hottest year of the century they whisper the correction on the back pages and say it makes no difference– that is how we know that those who push the global warming agenda will build the facts fit their agenda everytime, regardless of the info.

It should plus give one pause to review the actual condition and environment around our nation’s weather stations (not to mention Europe’s) and wonder how corrupted the original climate info is even before they try to manipulate it.

But Anthony Watts of Chico, Calif., suspects NOAA temperature readings are not all they’re cracked up to be. As the former TV meteorologist explains on his sophisticated, newly hatched Web site surfacestations.org, he has set out to do what big-time armchair-climate modelers like Hansen and no one else has ever done - physically quality-check each weather station to see whether it’s being operated properly.

To guarantee accuracy, stations (essentially older thermometers in little four-legged wooden sheds or digital thermometers mounted on poles) should be 100 feet from buildings, not placed on hot concrete, etc. But as photos on Watts’ site show, the station in Forest Grove, Ore., stands 10 feet from an air-conditioning exhaust vent. In Roseburg, Ore., it’s on a rooftop approach an AC unit. In Tahoe, Calif., it’s next to a drum where trash is burned.

Watts, who says he’s a man of facts and science, isn’t jumping to any rash conclusions based on the 40-some weather stations his volunteers have checked so far. But he said Tuesday that what he’s finding raises doubts approximately NOAA’s past and current temperature reports. ~pittsburghlive.com

The fact that these climate scientists refuse to disclose and produce available the algorithms and software they use to model climate input and compose their predictions (and pronouncements of doom) is evidence that they are in fact skewing the notes to fit their end conclusion.

We are told by the ‘consensus’ that capitalism and industry are responsible for global warming to a 99.9% certainty. And yet they are 100% wrong approximately their primary propaganda tool, “the hottest year on record.” What other hidden facts used to force ‘total consensus’ are wrong?

Additional reading: